|
Maryam Navaie, DrPH, MBA1,2 Bartolome R. Celli, MD3 Zhun Xu, PhD4 Soojin Cho-Reyes, PhD1 Carole Dembek, MS5 Todd P. Gilmer, PhD4
Author Affiliations
- Advance Health Solutions, New York, New York
- School of Professional Studies, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Harvard Medical School and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Division of Health Policy, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, Massachusetts
Address correspondence to:
Maryam Navaie, DrPH, MBA
Advance Health Solutions, LLC
5 Penn Plaza, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10001
Phone : (212) 835-1510
E-mail: mnavaie@advancehealthsolutions.com
Abstract
Background: Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs), with or without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), delivered by handheld inhalers or nebulizers are recommended as maintenance therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated exacerbations, health resource utilization (HRU), and costs among Medicare beneficiaries with COPD on handheld ICS+LABA who switched to nebulized arformoterol (ARF) or continued ICS+LABA following a respiratory event.
Methods: Using Medicare claims, we identified beneficiaries with COPD (international classification of disease, 9th revision, clinical modification [ICD-9-CM] 490-492.xx, 494.xx, 496.xx) between 2010-2014 who had ≥ 1 year of continuous enrollment in Parts A, B, and D; ≥ 2 COPD-related outpatient visits ≥ 30 days apart or ≥ 1 hospitalization(s); ICS+LABA use 90-days before ARF initiation; and a respiratory event (COPD-related hospitalization or emergency department [ED] visit < 30 days before ARF initiation). Using propensity scores, 423 beneficiaries who switched to ARF were matched to 423 beneficiaries who continued on handheld ICS+LABA (controls). Difference-in-difference regression models examined outcomes at 180-days follow-up.
Results: Beneficiaries who switched to ARF had 1.5 fewer exacerbations (p=0.015) but no difference in hospitalizations and ED visits compared to controls. Durable medical equipment (DME) costs were higher among ARF users than controls ($1590), yet total health care costs were similar due to cost offsets by ARF in pharmacy (-$794), inpatient (-$524), and outpatient care (-$65). ARF accounted for 55% ($886.63) of DME costs, with the remaining costs attributed to oxygen therapy ($428.10) and nebulized corticosteroids ($590.85).
Conclusions: Switching from handheld ICS+LABA to nebulized ARF resulted in fewer COPD exacerbations among Medicare beneficiaries. Nebulized LABAs may improve outcomes in selected patients with COPD.
Citation
Citation: Navaie M, Celli BR, Xu Z, Cho-Reyes S, Dembek C, Gilmer TP. Exacerbations, health resource utilization, and costs among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with nebulized arformoterol following a respiratory event.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019; 6(4): 297-307. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.6.4.2019.0127
|
Donald A Mahler, MD1 Edward Kerwin, MD2 Lindsey Murray, PhD, MPH3 Carole Dembek, MS4
Author Affiliations
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, Medford, Oregon
- Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, Massachusetts
Address correspondence to:
Carole Dembek
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
84 Waterford Drive
Marlborough, MA 01752
Phone: +1 508-357-7704
Email: carole.dembek@sunovion.com
Abstract
Background: Chronic cough, dyspnea, and excessive sputum production, the characteristic symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), can negatively affect patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The fixed-dose combination of a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LABA/LAMA) have been shown to improve HRQoL and COPD symptoms as measured by the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) total scores. However, the impact of a LABA/LAMA on the individual components of HRQoL and dyspnea with daily activities is unknown.
Methods: Secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 replicate, phase 3, 12-week, randomized, placebo, and active-controlled trials of twice-daily indacaterol/glycopyrrolate (IND/GLY) were analyzed. Change from baseline in HRQoL and dyspnea was measured by SGRQ and TDI, respectively. Total and component scores were evaluated using linear mixed models. Logistic regression was used to analyze the proportion of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference. Study outcomes were further explored in patient subgroups.
Results: A total of 2038 patients from FLIGHT1/FLIGHT2 studies were evaluated. IND/GLY significantly improved SGRQ component scores (symptoms [–7.3], activity [–3.6], and impacts [–5.0]); all P < 0.001 compared with placebo. IND/GLY also significantly improved symptoms scores compared with IND and GLY (–3.5 and –3.7, respectively; both P < 0.001). Patients treated with IND/GLY also had significant improvements in TDI component scores compared with placebo: functional impairment (0.48), magnitude of task (0.61), and magnitude of effort (0.54); all P < 0.001. All component scores were significantly higher for IND/GLY compared with IND and GLY (P ≤ 0.002 for all).
Conclusions: Twice-daily IND/GLY significantly improved total scores as well as components of HRQoL and dyspnea in patients with COPD. These data demonstrate multiple clinical benefits of LABA/LAMA maintenance therapy in the COPD population.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 01727141 and NCT 01712516
Citation
Citation: Mahler DA, Kerwin E, Murray L, Dembek C. The impact of twice-daily indacaterol/glycopyrrolate on the components of health-related quality of life and dyspnea in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019; 6(4): 308-320. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.6.4.2019.0131
|
Donald A. Mahler, MD1 Jill A. Ohar, MD2 Chris N. Barnes, PhD3 Edmund J. Moran, PhD3 Srikanth Pendyala, MD3 Glenn D. Crater, MD3
Author Affiliations
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire and Respiratory Services, Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, New Hampshire
- Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
- Theravance Biopharma US, Inc., South San Francisco, California
Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate (sPIFR) may not benefit optimally from dry powder inhalers (DPI) because of inadequate inspiratory flow. Nebulized bronchodilators may provide a better alternative. We compared bronchodilation with the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) revefenacin for nebulization versus the DPI LAMA tiotropium, in patients with COPD and sPIFR (< 60 L/min against the resistance of Diskus®).
Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 28-day Phase 3b study in patients with COPD enrolled based on sPIFR. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on Day 29 for revefenacin for nebulization versus tiotropium HandiHaler® DPI.
Results: We enrolled 206 patients with mean (standard deviation) age, 65 (8) years; percent predicted FEV1, 37 (16)%; PIFR, 45 (12) L/min. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, revefenacin improved trough FEV1 from baseline; however, the difference versus tiotropium was not significant (least squares [LS] mean difference [standard error], 17.0 [22.4] mL, P=0.4461). In a prespecified analysis of patients with FEV1 < 50% predicted, revefenacin produced an LS mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]), 49.1 (6.3—91.9) mL in trough FEV1 and 103.5 (7.7—199.3) mL in forced vital capacity versus tiotropium. Revefenacin produced >100 mL increase in FEV1 in 41.6% versus 34.4% of patients with tiotropium in ITT and 41.4% versus 25.7% of patients in FEV1 < 50% predicted populations.
Conclusions: Revefenacin did not produce significant improvements in FEV1 versus tiotropium in the ITT population, but increased trough FEV1 in patients with FEV1 < 50% predicted and sPIFR.
Clinical Trial Registration (www.Clinicaltrials.gov): Study 0149 (NCT03095456)
Citation
Citation: Mahler DA, Ohar JA, Barnes CN, Moran EJ, Pendyala S, Crater GD. Nebulizedversus dry powder long-acting muscarinic antagonist bronchodilators in patients with COPD and suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019; 6(4): 321-331. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.6.4.2019.0137
|
Valentin Prieto-Centurion, MD, MS1 Richard Casaburi, PhD, MD2 David B. Coultas, MD3 Mayank M. Kansal, MD1 Spyros Kitsiou, PhD1 Julia J. Luo, BS1 Jun Ma, MD, PhD1 Cynthia S. Rand, PhD4 Ai-Yui M. Tan, MD1 Jerry A. Krishnan, MD, PhD1,5
Author Affiliations
- University of Illinois at Chicago
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance
- Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Design, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago
Address correspondence to:
Valentin Prieto-Centurion, MD, MS
University of Illinois at Chicago
1220 S. Wood St, MC 619
Chicago, IL 60608
Phone: (312) 413-1960
Email: vprieto@uic.edu
Abstract
Background: Low physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To inform the design of a home-based physical activity promotion program for patients with COPD recently discharged from a minority-serving hospital, we conducted a cohort study to evaluate objectively measured daily physical activity and patient-reported outcomes.
Methods: This was a 12-week prospective cohort study of patients with a physician diagnosis of COPD recently hospitalized (≤ 12 weeks) for respiratory symptoms. Daily physical activity was recorded using wrist-based and “clip-on” pedometers, and analyzed as mean daily step counts averaged over 7 days.
Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled a median (interquartile range, [IQR]) of 14 (7 to 29) days after hospital discharge. The median daily step count (IQR) in the first week after enrollment (week 1) was 3710 (1565 to 5129) steps. The median within-person change in daily step count (IQR) from week 1 to week 12 was 314 (-30 to 858) steps (p=0.28). Within-person correlation of week-to-week daily step counts was high (r ≥ 0.75). Time from hospital discharge to enrollment was not correlated with mean daily step counts on week 1 (r= -0.13) and only weakly correlated with change in mean daily step counts from week 1 to week 12 (r=0.37).
Conclusions: Daily physical activity was variable in this cohort of recently hospitalized patients with COPD, but with little within-person change over a 12-week period. These observations highlight the need for flexible physical activity promotion programs addressing the needs of a heterogeneous patient population.
Citation
Citation: Prieto-Centurion V, Casaburi R, Coultas DB, et al. Daily physical activity in patients with COPD after hospital discharge in a minority population.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019; 6(4): 332-340. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.6.4.2019.0136
|
|