|
Oliver J. McElvaney, MD, PhD1,2,3,4 Brian Cleary, MD1 Daniel D. Fraughen, MD1,2 Geraldine Kelly, MBA5 Oisin F. McElvaney, MD, PhD1 Mark P. Murphy, PhD1 Peter Branagan, MD1,2 Cedric Gunaratnam, MD1,2 Tomás P. Carroll, PhD1,5 Christopher H. Goss, MD, MSc3,4,6 Noel G. McElvaney, MD1,2
Author Affiliations
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- National Centre for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
- Alpha-1 Foundation of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
Address correspondence to:
Oliver J. McElvaney, MD, PhD
Department of Medicine
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Dublin, Ireland
Phone: +353 18093763
Email: olivermcelvaney@rcsi.ie
Abstract
Background: Patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) exhibit dysregulated inflammatory responses and a predilection for autoimmunity. While the adverse event (AE) profiles of COVID-19 vaccines in several chronic inflammatory conditions are now available, safety and tolerability data for patients with severe AATD have yet to be described. The feasibility of coadministering vaccines against COVID-19 and influenza in this population is similarly unclear.
Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 170 patients with Pi*ZZ genotype AATD receiving their initial vaccination series with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca). Patients were monitored clinically for AEs over the week that followed their first and second doses. In parallel, we conducted the same assessments in patients with Pi*MM genotype chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=160) and Pi*MM individuals without lung disease (n=150). The Pi*ZZ cohort was subsequently followed through 2 consecutive mRNA-based booster vaccines (monovalent and bivalent BNT162b2, Pfizer/BioNTech). To assess the safety of combined vaccination against COVID-19 and influenza, the quadrivalent influenza vaccine was administered to participants attending for their second COVID-19 booster vaccination, either on the same day or following a 1-week interval.
Results: Pi*ZZ AATD participants did not display increased AEs compared to Pi*MM COPD or Pi*MM non-lung disease controls. Although unexpected and serious vaccine-associated AEs did occur, the majority of AEs experienced across the 3 groups were mild and self-limiting. The AATD demographic at highest risk for AEs (especially systemic and prolonged AEs) was young females. No increase in AE risk was observed in patients with established emphysema, sonographic evidence of liver disease, or in those receiving intravenous augmentation therapy. AE incidence declined sharply following the initial vaccine series. Same-day coadministration of the COVID-19 mRNA bivalent booster vaccine and the annual influenza vaccine did not result in increased AEs compared to sequential vaccines 1 week apart.
Conclusions: Despite their pro-inflammatory state, patients with severe AATD are not at increased risk of AEs or serious AEs compared to patients with nonhereditary COPD and patients without lung disease. Same-day coadministration of COVID-19 booster vaccines with the annual influenza vaccine is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in this population.
Citation
Citation: McElvaney OJ, Cleary B, Fraughen DD, et al. Safety and reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in severe alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(1): 3-12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0432
|
Alex D. Federman, MD, MPH1 Rachel O’Conor, PhD2 Jeannys Nnemnbeng, MD, RRT3 Jyoti Ankam, MBBS, MPH1 Danielle McDermott, MS, CSCS4 Peter K. Lindenauer, MD, MSc5 Michael S. Wolf, PhD, MPH2 Juan P. Wisnivesky, MD, DrPH1,6
Author Affiliations
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, New York, New York, United States
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
- Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Healthcare Delivery and Population Sciences, Chan Medical School-Baystate, University of Massachusetts, Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Address correspondence to:
Alex D. Federman, MD, MPH
Division of General Internal Medicine
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
17 East 102nd Street
Box 1087
New York, NY 10029
Phone: (212) 824-7565
Email: alex.federman@mssm.edu
Abstract
Purpose: To test the feasibility of a novel self-management support intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods: We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial involving patients ≥40 years with severe or very severe COPD in New York, New York (n=59). Community health workers screened patients and addressed barriers to COPD self-management. Patients were also offered home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) and an antibiotic and steroid rescue pack. Control patients received general COPD education. Clinical outcomes for intervention and control were compared by difference-in-differences (DiD) at baseline and 6 months. The study was not powered for statistically significant differences for any measure. Feasibility measures were collected at 6 months.
Results: There were high rates of completion of intervention activities, including 75% of patients undergoing evaluation for and participating in HBPR. Most (92%) intervention patients said the program was very or extremely helpful and 96% said they would participate again. Clinical outcomes generally favored the intervention: COPD assessment test, DiD -1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.9 to 3.6); 6-minute walk test distance, DiD 7.4 meters (95% CI -45.1 to 59.8); self-reported hospitalizations, DiD -9.8% (95% CI -42.3% to 22.8%); medication adherence, DiD 7.7% (-29.6%, 45.0%), and Physical Activity Adult Questionnaire, DiD 86 (95% CI -283 to 455). Intervention patients reported more emergency department visits, DiD 10.6% (95% CI 17.7% to 38.8%).
Conclusion: A highly patient-centered, self-management support intervention for people with COPD was well received by patients and associated with potential improvements in clinical and self-management outcomes. A fully powered study of the intervention is warranted.
Citation
Citation: Federman AD, O’Conor R, Nnemnbeng J, et al. Feasibility trial of a comprehensive, highly patient-centered COPD self-management support program. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(1): 13-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0419
|
Abigail L. Koch, MD1 Tracie L. Shing, DrPH2 Andrew Namen, MD3 David Couper, PhD2 Benjamin Smith, MD, MSc4 R. Graham Barr, MD, PhD4 Surya Bhatt, MD, MSPH5 Nirupama Putcha, MD, MHS6 Aaron Baugh, MD7 Amit K. Saha, PhD, MS3 Michelle Zeidler, MD8 Alejandro Comellas, MD9 Christopher B. Cooper, MD8 Igor Barjaktarevic, MD, PhD8 Russell P. Bowler, MD, PhD10 MeiLan K. Han, MD, MS11 Victor Kim, MD12 Robert Paine, III, MD13 Richard E. Kanner, MD13 Jerry A. Krishnan, MD, PhD14 Fernando J. Martinez, MD, MS15 Prescott G. Woodruff, MD, MPH7 Nadia N. Hansel, MD6 Eric A. Hoffman, PhD9 Stephen P. Peters, MD, PhD3 Victor E. Ortega, MD, PhD16 for the SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) Investigators
Author Affiliations
- Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
- Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, Department of Biostatistics, Gilling’s School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
- Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunological Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest, North Carolina, United States
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
- Departments of Radiology, Medicine, and Bioengineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Respiratory Diseases, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Address correspondence to:
Abigail L. Koch, MD
University of Miami
1951 NW 7th Ave 2nd Floor
Miami, FL 33136
Phone: (813)465-2644
Email:Abigail.koch@miami.edu
Abstract
Rationale: The SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) is a prospective cohort study that enrolled 2981 participants with the goal of identifying new chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subgroups and intermediate markers of disease progression. Individuals with COPD and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) experience impaired quality of life and more frequent exacerbations. COPD severity also associates with computed tomography scan-based emphysema and alterations in airway dimensions.
Objectives: The objective was to determine whether the combination of lung function and structure influences the risk of OSA among current and former smokers.
Methods: Using 2 OSA risk scores, the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire (BSQ), and the DOISNORE50 (Diseases, Observed apnea, Insomnia, Snoring, Neck circumference > 18 inches, Obesity with body mass index [BMI] > 32, R = are you male, Excessive daytime sleepiness, 50 = age ≥ 50) (DIS), 1767 current and former smokers were evaluated for an association of lung structure and function with OSA risk.
Measurements and Main Results: The study cohort's mean age was 63 years, BMI was 28 kg/m2, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 74.8% predicted. The majority were male (55%), White (77%), former smokers (59%), and had COPD (63%). A high-risk OSA score was reported in 36% and 61% using DIS and BSQ respectively. There was a 9% increased odds of a high-risk DIS score (odds ratio [OR]=1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.03–1.14) and nominally increased odds of a high-risk BSQ score for every 10% decrease in FEV1 %predicted (OR=1.04, 95%CI: 0.998–1.09). Lung function-OSA risk associations persisted after additionally adjusting for lung structure measurements (%emphysema, %air trapping, parametric response mapping for functional small airways disease, , mean segmental wall area, tracheal %wall area, dysanapsis) for DIS (OR=1.12, 95%CI:1.03–1.22) and BSQ (OR=1.09, 95%CI:1.01–1.18).
Conclusions: Lower lung function independently associates with having high risk for OSA in current and former smokers. Lung structural elements, especially dysanapsis, functional small airways disease, and tracheal %wall area strengthened the effects on OSA risk.
|
Kevin I. Duan, MD, MS1,2 Lucas M. Donovan, MD, MS2,3 Laura J. Spece, MD, MS2,3 Edwin S. Wong, PhD2,3,4 Laura C. Feemster, MD, MS2,3 Alexander D. Bryant, MD, MS5 Robert Plumley3 Kristina Crothers, MD2,3 David H. Au, MD, MS2,3
Author Affiliations
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, United States
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
- Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
Address correspondence to:
Kevin Duan, MD, MS
Centre for Lung Health at Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre
2775 Laurel Street, 7th Floor
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada, V5Z 1M9
Email: kevin.duan@ubc.ca
Phone: (604) 875-4122
Abstract
Rationale: Prescription formularies specify which medications are available to patients. Formularies change frequently, potentially forcing patients to switch medications for nonclinical indications (nonmedical switching). Nonmedical switching is known to impact disease control and adherence. The consequences of nonmedical switching have not been rigorously studied in COPD.
Methods: We conducted a cohort study of Veterans with COPD on inhaler therapy in January 2016 when formoterol was removed from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national formulary. A 2-point difference-in-differences analysis using multivariable negative binomial and generalized linear models was performed to estimate the association of the formulary change with patient outcomes in the 6 months before and after the change. Our primary outcome was the number of COPD exacerbations in 6 months, with secondary outcomes of total health care encounters and encounter-related costs in 6 months.
Results: We identified 10,606 Veterans who met our inclusion criteria, of which 409 (3.9%) experienced nonmedical switching off formoterol. We did not identify a change in COPD exacerbations (-0.04 exacerbations; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.12, 0.03) associated with the formulary change. In secondary outcome analysis, we did not observe a change in the number of health care encounters (-0.12 visits; 95% CI -1.00, 0.77) or encounter-related costs ($369; 95% CI -$1141, $1878).
Conclusions: Among COPD patients on single inhaler therapy, nonmedical inhaler switches due to formulary discontinuation of formoterol were not associated with changes in COPD exacerbations, encounters, or encounter-related costs. Additional research is needed to confirm our findings in more severe disease and other settings.
Citation
Citation: Duan KI, Donovan LM, Spece LJ, et al. Inhaler formulary change in COPD and the association with exacerbations, health care utilization, and costs. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(1): 37-46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0425
|
Daniel C. Belz, MD, MPH1 Han Woo, PhD1 Mariah K. Jackson, RD2 Nirupama Putcha, MD, MHS1 Ashraf Fawzy, MD, MPH1 Wendy Lorizio, MD, MPH1 Meredith C. McCormack, MD, MHS1 Michelle N. Eakin, PhD, MA1 Corrine K. Hanson, PhD, RD2 Nadia N. Hansel, MD, MPH1
Author Affiliations
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Medical Nutrition Program, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Address correspondence to:
Daniel C. Belz, MD, MPH
5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle
Baltimore MD, 21224
Phone: (410) 550-5405
Email: dbelz2@jhmi.edu
Abstract
Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Food insecurity is more common among individuals with low SES and has been associated with poor outcomes in other chronic illnesses, but its impact on COPD has not been studied.
Methods: Former smokers with spirometry-confirmed COPD were recruited from low-income areas of Baltimore, Maryland, and followed for 9 months as part of a cohort study of diet and indoor air pollution. Food insecurity and respiratory outcomes, including COPD exacerbations and patient-reported outcomes, were assessed at regular intervals. The association between food insecurity and COPD outcomes was analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Additional analyses examined the association of COPD morbidity with subdomains of food insecurity and the association of food insecurity with psychological well-being measures.
Results: Ninety-nine participants had available data on food insecurity and COPD outcomes. A total of 26.3% of participants were food insecure at 1 or more times during the study. After adjusting for individual SES, neighborhood poverty, and low healthy food access, food insecurity was associated with a higher incidence rate of moderate and severe exacerbations and worse dyspnea, COPD health status, and respiratory-specific quality of life. Subdomains of food insecurity were independently associated with worse patient-reported outcomes. Food insecurity was additionally associated with higher perceived stress.
Discussion: Among former smokers with COPD, food insecurity was associated with a higher incidence of exacerbations, worse patient-reported outcomes, and higher perceived stress. Subdomains of food insecurity were independently associated with worse patient-reported outcomes.
Citation
Citation: Belz DC, Woo H, Jackson MK, et al. Food insecurity is associated with COPD morbidity and perceived stress. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(1): 47-55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0440
|
Anne O. Nielsen, MD, PhD1 Peter Lange, MD2 Ole Hilberg, MD3,4 Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard, MSc3,4 Rikke Ibsen, MSc4 Anders Løkke, DrMed, MD3,4
Author Affiliations
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, North Zealand Hospital Hillerød, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Herlev/Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Little Belt, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Address correspondence to:
Anders Løkke, DrMed, MD
Department of Medicine
Hospital Little Belt
Vejle, Denmark
Email: aloekke@gmail.com
Phone: 0045 28894197
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a chronic, often progressive disease, which in most patients is caused by tobacco smoking. Our study focuses on differences in COPD-related outcomes between never smokers, former smokers, and current smokers.
Methods: A nationwide, population-based cohort study utilizing Danish health registries. Clinical and socioeconomic variables including smoking status, comorbidities, and dyspnea were obtained. Poisson and Cox Regression were used to calculate the impact of these clinical parameters on the risk of moderate and severe exacerbations and mortality during 12 months of follow-up.
Results: A total of 49,826 patients ≥40 years of age, with a hospital diagnosis of COPD in 2008–2017, were identified (mean age 69.2 years, 52% females). A total of 2127 (4%) were never smokers, 29,854 (60%) were former smokers and 17,845 (36%) current smokers. Compared to former and current smokers, never smokers reported a lower modified Medical Research Council score and had a milder COPD stage according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification. During follow-up, never smokers had a significantly lower risk of severe exacerbations (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78–0.97) and a lower rate of death (mortality ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.70–0.81) compared to patients with a smoking history.
Discussion: Our nationwide study showed that COPD in never smokers is characterized by a lower level of dyspnea, milder lung function impairment, and a lower risk of exacerbations and death. At the same time, we found active smokers to have the highest risk. These findings highlight the need for campaigns to prevent smoking and may help general practitioners as well as other health care professionals to motivate patients with COPD to stop smoking.
Citation
Citation: Nielsen AO, Lange P, Hilberg O, Farver-Vestergaard I, Ibsen R, Løkke A. COPD and smoking status – it does matter: characteristics and prognosis of COPD according to smoking status. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(1): 56-67. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0433
|
Laura M. Paulin, MD, MHS1 Michael J. Halenar, MPH2 Kathryn C. Edwards, PhD2 Kristin Lauten, MA2 Kristie Taylor, PhD2 Mary Brunette, MD1 Susanne Tanski, MD, MPH1 Todd MacKenzie, PhD1 Cassandra A. Stanton, PhD2 Dorothy Hatsukami, PhD3 Andrew Hyland, PhD4 Martin C. Mahoney, MD, PhD4 Ray Niaura, PhD5 Dennis Trinidad, PhD, MPH6 Carlos Blanco, MD, PhD7 Wilson Compton, MD, MPE7 Lisa D. Gardner, PhD, MS8 Heather L. Kimmel, PhD7 K. Michael Cummings, PhD, MPH9 Dana Lauterstein, PhD8 Esther J. Roh, PhD, MS8 Daniela Marshall, PhD7,10 James D. Sargent, MD1
Author Affiliations
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The C. Everett Koop Institute at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States
- Behavioral Health and Health Policy Practice, Westat, Rockville, Maryland, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States
- University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
- Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
- Axle Informatics, Rockville, Maryland, United States
Abstract
Introduction: We examined the association between tobacco product use and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Waves 1–5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.
Methods: Adults ≥40 years with an ever COPD diagnosis were included in cross-sectional (Wave 5) and longitudinal (Waves 1 to 5) analyses. Tobacco use included 13 mutually exclusive categories of past 30-day (P30D) single use and polyuse with P30D exclusive cigarette use and ≥5-year cigarette cessation as reference groups. Multivariable linear regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between tobacco use and HRQoL as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 questionnaire.
Results: Of 1670 adults, 79.4% ever used cigarettes; mean (standard error [SE]) pack years was 30.9 (1.1). In cross-sectional analysis, P30D exclusive cigarette use, and e-cigarette/cigarette dual use were associated with worse HRQoL compared to ≥5-year cigarette cessation. Compared to P30D exclusive cigarette use, never tobacco use and ≥5-year cigarette cessation were associated with better HRQoL, while e-cigarette/cigarette dual use had worse HRQoL. Longitudinally (n=686), e-cigarette/cigarette dual use was associated with worsening HRQoL compared to both reference groups. Only never tobacco use was associated with higher HRQoL over time compared to P30D exclusive cigarette use.
Conclusions: E-cigarette/cigarette dual use was associated with worse HRQoL compared to ≥5-year cigarette cessation and exclusive cigarette use. Never use and ≥5-year cigarette cessation were the only categories associated with higher HRQoL compared to exclusive cigarette use. Findings highlight the importance of complete smoking cessation for individuals with COPD.
Citation
Citation: Paulin LM, Halenar MJ, Edwards KC, et al. Relationship between tobacco product use and health-related quality of life among individuals with COPD in waves 1–5 (2013–2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(1): 68-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0422
|
Matthew T. Donnan, BSc, MBBS1,2 Shailesh Bihari, MBBS, FCICM, MD, PhD3,4 Ashwin Subramaniam, MBBS, MMED, FRACP, FCICM, PhD5-7 Eli J. Dabscheck, MBBS, MclinEpi, FRACP2,8 Brooke Riley, BBioMedSc, MBBS, FCICM1 David V. Pilcher, MBBS, MRCP1,7,9
Author Affiliations
- Department of Intensive Care, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia
- Department of Intensive and Critical Care, Finders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, Centre for Outcome and Resources Evaluation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Abstract
Rationale: Frailty is an increasingly recognized aspect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The impact of frailty on long-term survival after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) due to an exacerbation of COPD has not been described.
Objective: The objective was to quantify the impact of frailty on time to death up to 4 years after admission to the ICU in Australia and New Zealand for an exacerbation of COPD.
Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to 179 ICUs with a primary diagnosis of an exacerbation of COPD using the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2020, in New Zealand, and March 31, 2022, in Australia. Frailty was measured using the clinical frailty scale (CFS). The primary outcome was survival up to 4 years after ICU admission. The secondary outcome was readmission to the ICU due to an exacerbation of COPD.
Measurements and Main Results: We examined 7126 patients of which 3859 (54.1%) were frail (CFS scores of 5–8). Mortality in not-frail individuals versus frail individuals at 1 and 4 years was 19.8% versus 40.4%, and 56.8% versus 77.3% respectively (both p<0.001). Frailty was independently associated with a shorter time to death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval 1.54–1.80).There was no difference in the proportion of survivors with or without frailty who were readmitted to the ICU during a subsequent hospitalization.
Conclusion: Frailty was independently associated with poorer long-term survival in patients admitted to the ICU with an exacerbation of COPD.
Citation
Citation: Donnan MT, Bihari S, Subramaniam A, Dabscheck EJ, Riley B, Pilcher DV. The long-term impact of frailty after an intensive care unit admission due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(1): 83-94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0453
|
|